Current:Home > MyWisconsin’s Democratic governor sues Republican Legislature over blocking ‘basic functions’ -Wealth Legacy Solutions
Wisconsin’s Democratic governor sues Republican Legislature over blocking ‘basic functions’
Algosensey Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-03-11 04:34:13
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin Democratic Gov. Tony Evers on Tuesday sued the Republican-controlled Legislature, arguing that it is obstructing basic government functions, including signing off on pay raises for university employees that were previously approved.
Evers is asking the liberal-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court to take the case directly, bypassing lower courts.
Republican legislative leaders, Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu and Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, did not immediately return emails seeking comment.
In addition to not approving the pay raises for about 35,000 University of Wisconsin employees, Evers argues that the Legislature is blocking state conservation programs, updates to the state’s commercial building standards and ethics standards for licensed professionals.
The Legislature included a 6% pay raise for UW employees over two years in the state budget it passed earlier this year that Evers signed. But pay raises also must then be approved by a committee of legislative leaders. That panel on Oct. 17 approved pay raises for state workers, but not UW employees because Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos opposes spending at the university for diversity, equity and inclusion efforts and positions.
Evers argues in the lawsuit that the Legislature is breaking the state constitution and separation of powers by creating “legislative vetoes” through which committees controlled by a few Republican lawmakers can block actions of the executive branch.
Evers and the GOP-controlled Legislature have had a contentious relationship from the moment Evers was elected in November 2018. He has issued more vetoes than any other Wisconsin governor, including blocking numerous bills changing how elections would be run in the key presidential battleground state.
The Legislature convened a lame duck session just weeks before Evers took office to weaken the incoming governor’s powers. They have repeatedly rejected appointees Evers has made to boards and commissions, including firing a majority of the Natural Resources Board in October.
In another sign of their strained relationship, Evers has rarely met with Republican legislative leaders. Evers is in the first year of his second term.
Republicans have worked to increase the number of seats they hold to near veto-proof supermajorities. They have the necessary two-thirds majority in the Senate and are two votes shy in the Assembly.
Evers and other Democrats support a lawsuit before the state Supreme Court seeking to have the Republican-drawn legislative map tossed out in favor of one that would likely reduce the GOP majorities. Oral arguments in that case are scheduled for Nov. 21.
Evers’ new lawsuit contends that the Legislature is effectively attempting to change state law without passing a bill and sending it to the governor for either approval or a veto. The lawsuit contends that similar efforts by legislatures have been struck down by courts in Alaska, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, and West Virginia.
“Republican legislators are unconstitutionally obstructing basic functions of government—actions that have not only aimed to prevent state government from efficiently and effectively serving the people of our state but are now actively harming tens of thousands of Wisconsinites every day across our state,” Evers said in a statement.
The lawsuit argues that the state Supreme Court should take the case directly because of its significant statewide impact and the harm from blocking the pay raises, delaying programs and failing to achieve modern building standards. Four of the court’s seven justices, who are elected, are liberals, giving them a majority.
If the court agrees to accept the case, it would then set deadlines for arguments within weeks. Otherwise the case would have to work its way through the lower courts first, which would likely take months or longer.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Plan to Save North Dakota Coal Plant Faces Intense Backlash from Minnesotans Who Would Help Pay for It
- Warming Trends: Smelly Beaches in Florida Deterred Tourists, Plus the Dearth of Climate Change in Pop Culture and Threats to the Colorado River
- Warming Trends: British Morning Show Copies Fictional ‘Don’t Look Up’ Newscast, Pinterest Drops Climate Misinformation and Greta’s Latest Book Project
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- Justice Department threatens to sue Texas over floating border barriers in Rio Grande
- Montana becomes 1st state to approve a full ban of TikTok
- This Leakproof Water Bottle With 56,000+ Perfect Amazon Ratings Will Become Your Next Travel Essential
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- How much is your reputation worth?
Ranking
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- New Mexico Could Be the Fourth State to Add a Green Amendment to Its Constitution, But Time Is Short
- California Regulators Banned Fracking Wastewater for Irrigation, but Allow Wastewater From Oil Drilling. Scientists Say There’s Little Difference
- Jaden Smith Says Mom Jada Pinkett Smith Introduced Him to Psychedelics
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Researchers Say Science Skewed by Racism is Increasing the Threat of Global Warming to People of Color
- Climate Change Poses a Huge Threat to Railroads. Environmental Engineers Have Ideas for How to Combat That
- California Regulators Banned Fracking Wastewater for Irrigation, but Allow Wastewater From Oil Drilling. Scientists Say There’s Little Difference
Recommendation
Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
Louisville appoints Jacquelyn Gwinn-Villaroel as first Black woman to lead its police department
Inside Clean Energy: Here’s Why Some Utilities Support, and Others Are Wary of, the Federal Clean Energy Proposal
The $1.6 billion Dominion v. Fox News trial starts Tuesday. Catch up here
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
A big misconception about debt — and how to tackle it
Laid off on leave: Yes, it's legal and it's hitting some workers hard
Why sanctions don't work — but could if done right