Current:Home > MySouth Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech -Wealth Legacy Solutions
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
Will Sage Astor View
Date:2025-03-11 04:49:03
SEOUL, Dec 12 - South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol's switch from contrition to defiance on Thursday (Dec 11) over his martial law order rallied some supporters but other members of his party said it did nothing to sway their view that he must be removed from office.
In a speech before a second impeachment vote scheduled for Saturday, Yoon condemned his political opponents as "anti-state forces" that side with enemies in North Korea, said Pyongyang may have hacked the South's elections and defended last week's short-lived martial law order as a legal move to protect democracy.
The remarks hit many of the talking points featuring on conservative YouTube channels and marked a sharp change of tone from a speech before the first impeachment vote last week in which he apologised and said he would place his political future in the hands of his People Power Party.
It was unclear what caused the change but Yoon gave no sign of supporting a proposal by PPP leader Han Dong-hoon for him to resign in coming months and to hand authority to the prime minister and ruling party until then.
The speech brought to the fore divisions in the PPP. Changing tack, Han urged party members to vote for impeachment on Saturday, a move greeted by shouting from pro-Yoon lawmakers, who voted in Kweon Seong-dong as their new party floor leader shortly after Yoon's speech.
[[nid:712402]]
Kweon, a Yoon supporter, said the party's position was still to oppose the president's impeachment but that a meeting would be held before Saturday's vote to finalise plans.
The party boycotted the last vote, preventing a quorum. At least 200 votes are needed to impeach Yoon. Opposition parties have 192 seats, so they need at least eight PPP members to join.
As of Thursday, at least seven members of the party were expected to support a new impeachment motion.
One PPP lawmaker who said he would now vote to impeach Yoon said the president's new remarks may have rallied some loyalists but sowed more confusion and division among conservatives.
[[nid:712337]]
"His speech had an impact on the election of the floor leader. Also, it sounds like he urged those who blindly follow the president among conservatives to take action," PPP lawmaker Kim Sang-wook told reporters.
Kim said he felt frustrated and betrayed because the speech dashed his last hopes that Yoon would leave office in a "decent" way.
Public support for impeachment
Opinion polls show a majority of South Koreans support impeaching Yoon. A survey released by pollster Realmeter on Dec. 5 found 73.6 per cent of respondents supported impeachment, including 50.4 per cent of those who identified themselves as conservatives.
Yoon's speech lit up conservative political forums online, with the top-ranked posts titled "Martial law was the most reasonable decision", and "Han made a wrong decision".
After Yoon's speech, scuffles could be seen breaking out between attendees of a pro-conservative rally in central Seoul and an opposition supporter who removed a banner of support for Yoon's martial law declaration.
Kim Tae-hyun, who attended the rally, said he thought Yoon did a "good job" with his speech and had the right to declare martial law.
"And the impeachment just shouldn't happen... So (the martial law declaration) was merely an expression of the authority of the president," said Kim. "The Democratic Party, which is currently holding the country back, is the real issue."
[[nid:712404]]
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (98214)
Related
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- A federal judge tosses a lawsuit over the ban on recorded inmate interviews in South Carolina
- A 9/11 anniversary tradition is handed down to a new generation
- Threat against schools in New Jersey forces several closures; 3 in custody
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Why is Haason Reddick holding out on the New York Jets, and how much is it costing him?
- YouTube removes right-wing media company's channels after indictment alleges Russian funding
- Pitt fires athletic director Heather Lyke months before her contract was set to expire
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- Is soy milk good for you? What you need to know about this protein-rich, plant-based milk.
Ranking
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- New search opens for plane carrying 3 that crashed in Michigan’s Lake Superior in 1968
- New Hampshire governor helps save man choking on lobster roll at seafood festival contest
- Lions defeat Rams in overtime: Highlights, stats from Sunday Night Football
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- Spring rains destroyed a harvest important to the Oneida tribe. Farmers are working to adapt
- Officer put on leave in incident with Tyreek Hill, who says he's unsure why he was detained
- MLB power rankings: Braves and Mets to sprint for playoff lives in NL wild card race
Recommendation
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
Dairy Queen offers limited-time BOGO deal on Blizzards: How to redeem the offer
A federal judge tosses a lawsuit over the ban on recorded inmate interviews in South Carolina
Kathy Bates announces retirement after 'Matlock' reboot: 'It's exhausting'
Small twin
'Perfect Couple' stars Nicole Kidman, Liev Schreiber talk shocking finale
How many points did Caitlin Clark score today? She's closing in on rookie scoring record
The uproar around Francis Ford Coppola's ‘Megalopolis’ movie explained