Current:Home > InvestFederal Reserve is set to cut rates again while facing a hazy post-election outlook -Wealth Legacy Solutions
Federal Reserve is set to cut rates again while facing a hazy post-election outlook
Algosensey Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-03-11 07:23:04
WASHINGTON (AP) — No one knows how Tuesday’s presidential election will turn out, but the Federal Reserve’s move two days later is much easier to predict: With inflation continuing to cool, the Fed is set to cut interest rates for a second time this year.
The presidential contest might still be unresolved when the Fed ends its two-day meeting Thursday afternoon, yet that uncertainty would have no effect on its decision to further reduce its benchmark rate. The Fed’s future actions, though, will become more unsettled once a new president and Congress take office in January, particularly if Donald Trump were to win the White House again.
Trump’s proposals to impose high tariffs on all imports and launch mass deportations of unauthorized immigrants and his threat to intrude on the Fed’s normally independent rate decisions could send inflation surging, economists have said. Higher inflation would, in turn, compel the Fed to slow or stop its rate cuts.
On Thursday, the Fed’s policymakers, led by Chair Jerome Powell, are on track to cut their benchmark rate by a quarter-point, to about 4.6%, after having implemented a half-point reduction in September. Economists expect another quarter-point rate cut in December and possibly additional such moves next year. Over time, rate cuts tend to lower the costs of borrowing for consumers and businesses.
The Fed is reducing its rate for a different reason than it usually does: It often cuts rates to boost a sluggish economy and a weak job market by encouraging more borrowing and spending. But the economy is growing briskly, and the unemployment rate is a low 4.1%, the government reported Friday, even with hurricanes and a strike at Boeing having sharply depressed net job growth last month.
Instead, the central bank is lowering rates as part of what Powell has called “a recalibration” to a lower-inflation environment. When inflation spiked to a four-decade high of 9.1% in June 2022, the Fed proceeded to raise rates 11 times — ultimately sending its key rate to about 5.3%, also the highest in four decades.
But in September, year-over-year inflation dropped to 2.4%, barely above the Fed’s 2% target and equal to its level in 2018. With inflation having fallen so far, Powell and other Fed officials have said they think high borrowing rates are no longer necessary. High borrowing rates typically restrict growth, particularly in interest-rate-sensitive sectors such as housing and auto sales.
“The restriction was in place because inflation was elevated,” said Claudia Sahm, chief economist at New Century Advisors and a former Fed economist. “Inflation is no longer elevated. The reason for the restriction is gone.”
Fed officials have suggested that their rate cuts would be gradual. But nearly all of them have expressed support for some further reductions.
“For me, the central question is how much and how fast to reduce the target for the (Fed’s key) rate, which I believe is currently set at a restrictive level,” Christopher Waller, an influential member of the Fed’s Board of Directors, said in a speech last month.
Jonathan Pingle, an economist at Swiss bank UBS, said that Waller’s phrasing reflected “unusual confidence and conviction that rates were headed lower.”
Next year, the Fed will likely start to wrestle with the question of just how low their benchmark rate should go. Eventually, they may want to set it at a level that neither restricts nor stimulates growth — “neutral” in Fed parlance.
Powell and other Fed officials acknowledge that they don’t know exactly where the neutral rate is. In September, the Fed’s rate-setting committee estimated that it was 2.9%. Most economists think it’s closer to 3% to 3.5%.
The Fed chair said the officials have to assess where neutral is by how the economy responds to rate cuts. For now, most officials are confident that at 4.9%, the Fed’s current rate is far above neutral.
Some economists argue, though, that with the economy looking healthy even with high borrowing rates, the Fed doesn’t need to ease credit much, if at all. The idea is that they may already be close to the level of interest rates that neither slows nor stimulates the economy.
“If the unemployment rate stays in the low 4’s and the economy is still going to grow at 3%, does it matter that the (Fed’s) rate is 4.75% to 5%?” said Joe LaVorgna, chief economist at SMBC Nikko Securities, asked. “Why are they cutting now?”
With the Fed’s latest meeting coming right after Election Day, Powell will likely field questions at his news conference Thursday about the outcome of the presidential race and how it might affect the economy and inflation. He can be expected to reiterate that the Fed’s decisions aren’t affected by politics at all.
During Trump’s presidency, he imposed tariffs on washing machines, solar panels, steel and a range of goods from China, which President Joe Biden maintained. Though studies show that washing machine prices rose as a result, overall inflation did not rise much.
But Trump is now proposing significantly broader tariffs — essentially, import taxes — that would raise the prices of about 10 times as many goods from overseas.
Many mainstream economists are alarmed by Trump’s latest proposed tariffs, which they say would almost certainly reignite inflation. A report by the Peterson Institute for International Economics concluded that Trump’s main tariff proposals would make inflation 2 percentage points higher next year than it otherwise would have been.
The Fed could be more likely to raise rates in response to tariffs this time, according to economists at Pantheon Macroeconomics, “given that Trump is threatening much bigger increases in tariffs.”
“Accordingly,” they wrote, “we will scale back the reduction in the funds rate in our 2025 forecasts if Trump wins.”
veryGood! (64)
Related
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- ‘A Death Spiral for Research’: Arctic Scientists Worried as Alaska Universities Face 40% Funding Cut
- The future availability of abortion pills remains uncertain after conflicting rulings
- With 10 Appointees on the Ninth Circuit, Trump Seeks to Tame His Nemesis
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- The dream of wiping out polio might need a rethink
- 146 dogs found dead in home of Ohio dog shelter's founding operator
- Review: 'Yellowstone' creator's 'Lioness' misses the point of a good spy thriller
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Alana Honey Boo Boo Thompson Graduates From High School and Mama June Couldn't Be Prouder
Ranking
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Clean Energy Manufacturers Spared from Rising Petro-Dollar Job Losses
- Bill Barr condemns alleged Trump conduct, but says I don't like the idea of a former president serving time
- More pollen, more allergies: Personalized exposure therapy treats symptoms
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- This Week in Clean Economy: Manufacturing Job Surge Seen for East Coast Offshore Wind
- This Week in Clean Economy: Green Cards for Clean Energy Job Creators
- When homelessness and mental illness overlap, is forced treatment compassionate?
Recommendation
Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
This Week in Clean Economy: China Is Leading the Race for Clean Energy Jobs
Aerie's Clearance Section Has 76% Off Deals on Swimwear, Leggings, Tops & More
To Mask or Not? The Weighty Symbolism Behind a Simple Choice
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
'You forget to eat': How Ozempic went from diabetes medicine to blockbuster diet drug
Pipeline Payday: How Builders Win Big, Whether More Gas Is Needed or Not
This Week in Clean Economy: Cost of Going Solar Is Dropping Fast, State Study Finds