Current:Home > MyAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Wealth Legacy Solutions
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
Charles H. Sloan View
Date:2025-03-11 05:03:11
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (28394)
Related
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- House Republicans seek documents from White House over Biden's involvement in Hunter Biden's refusal to comply with congressional subpoena
- Pierce Brosnan faces charges after allegedly walking in Yellowstone's thermal areas
- 20 fillings, 4 root canals, 8 crowns in one visit add up to lawsuit for Minnesota dentist
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Federal judge accepts redrawn Georgia congressional and legislative districts that will favor GOP
- Mexico says a drug cartel kidnapped 14 people from towns where angry residents killed 10 gunmen
- AP Week in Pictures: North America
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- New law in Ohio cracks down on social media use among kids: What to know
Ranking
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- Wildfire smoke this year woke up places unaccustomed to its effects. Now what?
- Rare southern white rhinoceros born on Christmas Eve at Zoo Atlanta
- AP Week in Pictures: North America
- Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
- Social media apps made $11 billion from children and teens in 2022
- Trump back on ballot in Colorado while state Republicans appeal ban to Supreme Court
- This go-to tech gadget is like the Ring camera - but for your cargo bed
Recommendation
The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
What looked like a grenade caused a scare at Oregon school. It was a dog poop bag dispenser.
Massachusetts lottery winner chooses $390,000 over $25,000-per-year, for life
Perspective: Children born poor have little margin for mistakes or bad decisions, regardless of race
From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
Gypsy Rose Blanchard released from Missouri prison early Thursday morning, DOC confirms
What are the Dry January rules? What to know if you're swearing off alcohol in 2024.
Cardi B Weighs in on Her Relationship Status After Offset Split